Terrorist
Nidal Malik Hasan did not “crack.” He was not psychotic. He was not a victim of anti-Muslim discrimination. He
was a loser and a failure. And, like many losers and failures, he resorted to violence to inflate himself to something larger
than he was.
Hasan
enlisted in the U.S. Army in order to get a free medical education, not because he was a patriotic American. After the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001 he realized he was more sympathetic to the radical Islamist enemy than to the defense of the
United States of America. Thus, after his education was completed—and he
no longer had any use for the military—Hasan sought a lawyer to help him get out of his service commitment by claiming
anti-Muslim harassment.
Hasan
saw the Army as an educational meal ticket, not an organization where he could proudly serve his country—because he
considered “Palestine” his country. (Although
he was born in Arlington, Virginia,
Hasan listed his nationality as “Palestinian” on documents he filled out at his local mosque. His parents were
from Jordan; there is no nation called Palestine.)
Because
Hasan’s anti-harassment charges were minimal at best and fictitious at worst, he had little luck getting quietly discharged.
The U.S. military has close to zero tolerance for discrimination, and is
one of the most politically-correct institutions in the United States.
If Hasan was being “picked on” by someone he could certainly get that individual reprimanded, but that would not
earn him a “get out of jail” card. In trying to provoke anti-Muslim harassment against him, all Hasan succeeded
in doing was annoying and frightening his fellow Army doctors. As is sometimes the case in the Army, he was “disposed
of” with a promotion and a transfer to Fort Hood—enabling
his superiors to get him as far away from Walter Reed Medical Center
as possible. At Fort Hood,
Hasan escalated his outrageous behavior to prompt anti-Muslim “harassment” he needed to justify his request for
a discharge—but that backfired when he was instead ordered to the war zone.
Hasan’s
master plan had collapsed, and he realized he was a failure. He saw only one way out, a way that would transform him from
failure to hero: an act of jihad, to kill as many American soldiers as he could before they could be sent to Afghanistan to kill followers of his beloved Islam.
Ironically,
the killing spree was ended when Hasan—a man who refused to have his picture taken if women were also in the photograph—was
brought down by a female police officer. Hasan expected to die a martyr, and instead now has to endure the Muslim shame of
having been overpowered by a woman.
Some
apologists will argue that Hasan “snapped.” That is irrelevant. The events proceeded the way they did because
his allegiance was to Islam and the Palestinians, not the United States of America. Hasan’s act was not only one of terrorism, but
of treason. If you do not like one, choose the other. The death penalty is warranted in either case.
Don
Fredrick
November
12, 2009